949-957 Park Avenue Corp. v. Hansen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

949-957 Park Avenue Corp. v. Hansen

189 Misc. 422, 71 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2571

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1947

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 Misc. 422 (949-957 Park Avenue Corp. v. Hansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

949-957 Park Avenue Corp. v. Hansen, 189 Misc. 422, 71 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

[424]*424Memorandum

Per Curiam.

The evidence establishes that from September 15, 1946, to and including September 30, 1946, the appellant was in occupancy and possession as tenant of the landlord.

The primary lease contemplated the subleasing of the entire accommodations by the tenant under the primary lease.

It was therefore incumbent upon the landlord to bring itself within the exceptions contained in section 6 of the Office of Price Administration Bent Begulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Bental Area (9 Federal Begister 14987). In the circumstances the landlord was required to allege and prove it came within the exceptions. There is neither allegation nor proof of jurisdictional prerequisites (Carbonelli v. Bremer, 186 Misc. 348). Paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of section 6 did not dispense with such necessity; the said provision is retroactive in its* application and effect (Schwartz v. Trajer Realty Corporation, 56 F. Supp. 930; Lubin v. Streg, Inc., 56 F. Supp. 146).

The final order should be revérsed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

Shientag and Eder, JJ., concur; Hammer, J., dissents and votes for affirmance.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[424]*424Memorandum

Per Curiam.

The evidence establishes that from September 15, 1946, to and including September 30, 1946, the appellant was in occupancy and possession as tenant of the landlord.

The primary lease contemplated the subleasing of the entire accommodations by the tenant under the primary lease.

It was therefore incumbent upon the landlord to bring itself within the exceptions contained in section 6 of the Office of Price Administration Bent Begulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Bental Area (9 Federal Begister 14987). In the circumstances the landlord was required to allege and prove it came within the exceptions. There is neither allegation nor proof of jurisdictional prerequisites (Carbonelli v. Bremer, 186 Misc. 348). Paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of section 6 did not dispense with such necessity; the said provision is retroactive in its* application and effect (Schwartz v. Trajer Realty Corporation, 56 F. Supp. 930; Lubin v. Streg, Inc., 56 F. Supp. 146).

The final order should be revérsed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

Shientag and Eder, JJ., concur; Hammer, J., dissents and votes for affirmance.

Order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 Misc. 422, 71 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/949-957-park-avenue-corp-v-hansen-nyappterm-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack