Capitol Hill Hospital v. Baucom

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Capitol Hill Hospital v. Baucom

697 A.2d 760, 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 127

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 29, 1997

Docket94-CV-275, 92-CV-282

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 697 A.2d 760 (Capitol Hill Hospital v. Baucom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capitol Hill Hospital v. Baucom, 697 A.2d 760, 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 127 (D.C. 1997).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further consideration of the question whether, during voir dire, counsel for plaintiff exercised his peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner. On remand, the trial judge shall accord appropriate weight to the statistical evidence, and shall apply a more rigorous standard of scrutiny to counsel’s explanations for his strikes.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further consideration of the question whether, during voir dire, counsel for plaintiff exercised his peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner. On remand, the trial judge shall accord appropriate weight to the statistical evidence, and shall apply a more rigorous standard of scrutiny to counsel’s explanations for his strikes.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 A.2d 760, 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capitol-hill-hospital-v-baucom-dc-1997.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack