Capital City Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
This text of 269 F.2d 226 (Capital City Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In our opinion the Federal Communications Commission erred in deciding that a “protest” filed by appellant did not meet the requirements of § 309(c) of the Communications Act, 70 Stat. 3, 47 U.S.C.A. § 309(c), and in dismissing the protest. The order of dismissal is vacated and the case is remanded to the Commission with instructions to proceed in accordance with § 309(c).
Vacated and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 F.2d 226, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capital-city-television-inc-v-federal-communications-commission-cadc-1959.