Capital City Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
269 F.2d 226, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 35
Opinion
In our opinion the Federal Communications Commission erred in deciding that a “protest” filed by appellant did not meet the requirements of § 309(c) of the Communications Act, 70 Stat. 3, 47 U.S.C.A. § 309(c), and in dismissing the protest. The order of dismissal is vacated and the case is remanded to the Commission with instructions to proceed in accordance with § 309(c).
Vacated and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Capital City Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 269 F.2d 226, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 35 (D.C. Cir. 1959).
269 F.2d 226 (Capital City Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Helena Tv, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, James G. Edmiston, D/B/A Montana Microwave, Capital City Television, Inc., Intervenors
277 F.2d 88 (D.C. Circuit, 1960)
Capital City Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
269 F.2d 226 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)