Cannon v. Swindell

Fourth Circuit

Cannon v. Swindell

110 F. App'x 305

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cannon v. Swindell. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 F. App'x 905 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 21, 2004·No. No. 04-1450·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Haywood A. Cannon appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil rights action, denying his motion for reconsideration, and imposing a prefQing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cannon v. Swindell, No. CA-03-204-7-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Haywood A. Cannon appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil rights action, denying his motion for reconsideration, and imposing a prefQing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cannon v. Swindell, No. CA-03-204-7-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cannon v. Swindell, 110 F. App'x 305 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

110 F. App'x 305 (Cannon v. Swindell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.