Cannon v. Swindell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cannon v. Swindell. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 F. App'x 905
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2002·No. 02-1077·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1077

HAYWOOD ALLEN CANNON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LEWIS H. SWINDELL, IV; NORMAN EDWARD WIGGINS, Individually and in his capacity as administrator; MARVIN EUGENE WIGGINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-82-7-BR)

Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood Allen Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Lewis H. Swindell, IV, Norman Edward Wiggins, Marvin Eugene Wiggins, Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Haywood Allen Cannon appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Cannon v. Swindell, No. CA-01-82-7-BR (E.D.N.C.

Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cannon v. Swindell, (4th Cir. 2002).

Cannon v. Swindell (Cannon v. Swindell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related