Cannon v. State

553 So. 2d 370, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2833, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6848, 1989 WL 147943
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cannon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 548 So. 2d 1182
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1989·No. No. 88-00476·Published

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant challenges the legality of his sentence of one year of community control followed by four years probation. He contends that this is an illegal split sentence. This court has upheld such sentences in Skeens v. State, 542 So.2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) and Burrell v. Sate, 483 So.2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). In doing so we have acknowledged conflict with Williams v. State, 464 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Mitchell v. State, 463 So.2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) and Chessler v. State, 467 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). We adhere to our previous decisions. Affirmed.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cannon v. State, 553 So. 2d 370, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2833, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6848, 1989 WL 147943 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

553 So. 2d 370 (Cannon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. State
463 So. 2d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Burrell v. State
483 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Skeens v. State
542 So. 2d 436 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Williams v. State
464 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Chessler v. State
467 So. 2d 1102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)