Chessler v. State
This text of 467 So. 2d 1102 (Chessler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rosemarie CHESSLER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lee Rosenthal, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
LETTS, Judge.
We agree with the First District's recent decision in Williams v. State, 464 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) reh'g denied, 464 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), holding that the trial court cannot properly impose a period of community control to be followed by a period of probation.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to resentence the defendant.
*1103 We find no merit in the remaining points on appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
HERSEY and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 So. 2d 1102, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chessler-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.