Cancer Research Technology Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.

637 F.3d 1293, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 11938, 2011 WL 689961
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided February 28, 2011·No. 2010-1204·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PROST, Circuit Judge, with whom GAJARSA, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges, join, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

DYK, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by Defendants-Appellees, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Plaintiffs-Appellants. The petition for rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and the response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:
(1) The petition of Defendants-Appellees for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition of Defendants-Appellees for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court will issue on March 7, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cancer Research Technology Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., 637 F.3d 1293, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 11938, 2011 WL 689961 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

637 F.3d 1293 (Cancer Research Technology Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related