Campbell v. State

761 So. 2d 1219, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8133, 2000 WL 869405
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Campbell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 718 So. 2d 886
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 2000·No. No. 2D00-845·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Elliot S. Campbell appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). It appears from the record before this court that Campbell filed two different rule 3.800(a) motions in the trial court. The order now under appeal addresses only the first of those two motions. We affirm that order without comment. To the extent Campbell seeks review of the issues raised in the second motion, we dismiss the appeal as premature because the trial court has not yet ruled on that motion. This affirmance is without prejudice to Campbell seeking review of any subsequent order of the trial court disposing of the second rule 3.800(a) motion.

BLUE, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. State, 761 So. 2d 1219, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8133, 2000 WL 869405 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

761 So. 2d 1219 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.