Campbell v. State

745 So. 2d 399, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13713, 1999 WL 934338
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 20, 1999
DocketNo. 98-3795
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 745 So. 2d 399 (Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. State, 745 So. 2d 399, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13713, 1999 WL 934338 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Campbell appeals his sentence entered upon his plea of no contest to a felony charge. Appellant claims the trial court erred in assessing 24 community sanction violation points on his sentencing guidelines scoresheet for violations of community control being served concurrently in two separate cases, rather than 12 points as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.703(d)(17).

As we held in Brown v. State, 741 So.2d 1242, (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.703(d)(17) and section 921.0024(l)(b), Florida Statutes, limits to 12 points the number of community sanction violations points that may be assessed for each successive violation created by a new felony conviction. Accordingly, it was error for the trial court to assess 24 community sanction violation points based on the rationale that the new felony conviction violated Appellant’s community sanction sentences in separate cases being served concurrently.

REVERSED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.

BOOTH, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzales v. State
779 So. 2d 520 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
745 So. 2d 399, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13713, 1999 WL 934338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.