Campbell v. State

666 So. 2d 1017, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 379, 1996 WL 21678
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Campbell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 622 So. 2d 603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 1996·No. No. 94-4245·Published

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation. Appellant contends the revocation order is deficient, in that it does not set forth the specific conditions of probation which appellant was found to have violated. We affirm the order revoking probation, but remand for amendment of the order to reflect the specific terms and conditions of probation violated. Cue v. State, 619 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA1993).

BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. State, 666 So. 2d 1017, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 379, 1996 WL 21678 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

666 So. 2d 1017 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cue v. State
619 So. 2d 471 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)