Campbell v. State

616 So. 2d 181, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4075, 1993 WL 95546
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Campbell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 614 So. 2d 600
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 1993·No. No. 91-03945·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the departure sentence imposed for count I of case number 89-20201 because the trial court failed to file contemporaneous written reasons for departure, as required by Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). See State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991). Upon remand, the trial court shall impose a sentence within the guidelines for this offense. The defendant’s other convictions and sentences are affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.

RYDER, A.C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. State, 616 So. 2d 181, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4075, 1993 WL 95546 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 181 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lyles
576 So. 2d 706 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Ree v. State
565 So. 2d 1329 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)