Campbell v. State

543 So. 2d 885, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1346, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3103, 1989 WL 57880
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Campbell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 517 So. 2d 696
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 2, 1989·No. No. 89-250·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a motion for post-conviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, while his direct appeal from the judgment and sentence was pending in this court. The trial court improperly considered the motion. State v. Meneses, 392 So.2d 905 (Fla.1981). Therefore, although we affirm the lower court’s order denying the motion, we do so without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek post-conviction relief after disposition of the direct appeal and the return of jurisdiction to the lower court. State v. Meneses, 392 So.2d at 907; Brown v. State, 528 So.2d 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Sumpter v. State, 523 So.2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Libby v. State, 520 So.2d 322 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. State, 543 So. 2d 885, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1346, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3103, 1989 WL 57880 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

543 So. 2d 885 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Meneses
392 So. 2d 905 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Libby v. State
520 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Sumpter v. State
523 So. 2d 806 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Brown v. State
528 So. 2d 508 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)