Campbell v. State

351 So. 2d 1118, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16741
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Campbell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 342 So. 2d 1010
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 1977·No. No. 76-2700·Published

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

In review of this guilty plea we find the court did not follow the mandates of Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975); State v. Lyles, 316 So.2d 277 (Fla.1975), and Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). This cause is remanded to the trial court for hearing to determine if a factual basis exists for the charge against the Appellant. If so, then the Judgment is affirmed. If not, then the Appellant should be permitted to withdraw his plea and go to trial.

REMANDED with directions.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. State, 351 So. 2d 1118, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16741 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

351 So. 2d 1118 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Williams v. State
316 So. 2d 267 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
State v. Lyles
316 So. 2d 277 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)