Campbell v. State

386 So. 2d 629
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 1980·No. 79-1720/T4-703·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

386 So.2d 629 (1980)

Ronald Eugene CAMPBELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-1720/T4-703.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 13, 1980.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Polly M. Shull, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Gregory C. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction after a nolo contendere plea in a robbery case. Appellant pleaded nolo contendere and specifically reserved the right to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress certain evidence seized without a warrant. We do not decide this issue on appeal because, even if we were to reverse the order denying the suppression, the state has other evidence and eye witness testimony with which to try the appellant. Thus the issue is not dispositive of the case.

This type of appeal falls within the dictates of Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla. 1979), and State v. Ashby, 245 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1971).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, C.J., and COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. State, 386 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

386 So. 2d 629 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017
Vaughn v. State
711 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Finney v. State
420 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Ruiz v. State
416 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Jester v. State
405 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Sune v. State
402 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)