Campbell v. Jimines
This text of 3 Misc. 144 (Campbell v. Jimines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was a clear breach of contract of employment, and the rule of damages was properly applied by the learned trial judge. The employment contemplated [145]*145services to be rendered in tbe merchant marine, instead of which the. plaintiff, after he arrived at the West Indies, was ordered into the Haytian navy, a service he very properly declined to accept.
The plaintiff seems to have been ready, able and willing to do all he undertook to do, but was not afforded facilities for performance, and after a struggle, succeeded in reaching his home. There was no meritorious defense, and the jury properly found for the plaintiff. The judgment entered on their verdict must be affirmed, with costs.
Fitzsimons, J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Misc. 144, 23 N.Y.S. 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-jimines-nynyccityct-1893.