Campbell v. Jimenes

City of New York Municipal Court

Campbell v. Jimenes

5 Misc. 593, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 900

DecidedJuly 1, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Misc. 593 (Campbell v. Jimenes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. Jimenes, 5 Misc. 593, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 900 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Newburger, J.

Our appellate court having held (Campbell v. Jimenes, 3 Misc. Rep. 144) that the terms of the contract between plaintiff and defendant were ambiguous, and that the meaning of the instrument can only be determined by a jury, the trial justice, therefore, properly denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss.

There appears to be no other exception in the case of merit,. and judgment must, therefore* be affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI