Campbell v. Jimenes
25 N.Y.S. 1143
Opinion
Our appellate court having held (Campbell v. Jimenes, 23 N. Y. Supp. 333) that the terms of the contract between plaintiff and defendants were ambiguous, and that the meaning of the instrument can only be determined by a jury, the trial justice therefore properly denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss. There appears to be no other exception in the case of merit, and judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Campbell v. Jimenes, 25 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
25 N.Y.S. 1143 (Campbell v. Jimenes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campbell v. Jimenes
23 N.Y.S. 333 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)