Campbell v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks
163 S.E. 925, 202 N.C. 847, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 273
This text of 163 S.E. 925 (Campbell v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Campbell v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks, 163 S.E. 925, 202 N.C. 847, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 273 (N.C. 1932).
Opinion
Stacy, C. J., not sitting at the hearing of this appeal, and the Associate Justices being evenly divided in opinion as to whether there is error in the judgment, the judgment is affirmed. The decision does not become a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, 161 S. E., 223.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nebel v. . Nebel
161 S.E. 223 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Nebel v. Nebel
201 N.C. 840 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
163 S.E. 925, 202 N.C. 847, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-hood-commissioner-of-banks-nc-1932.