Campbell v. Campbell

644 So. 2d 172, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10370, 1994 WL 583833
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Campbell v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 635 So. 2d 44
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1994·No. No. 93-1996·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand the corrected final judgment so that the trial court can recalculate the amount of child support payable pursuant to the statutory support guidelines. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed. The record reflects that the trial court, in applying the guidelines, failed to adjust the amount due after recognizing, on a post-judgment motion, an error in the husband’s net earnings.

The trial court found total net income of $3,550 per month. Of this, the husband’s [173]*173income of $2,905 is 81%-82% of the total. There is no indication that the trial court was not applying the guidelines’ formula. Apparently, the monthly payment of $973.82 was simply erroneously calculated based on the trial court’s findings.

DELL, C.J., and STONE and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. Campbell, 644 So. 2d 172, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10370, 1994 WL 583833 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

644 So. 2d 172 (Campbell v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.