Campbell v. Campbell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Campbell v. Campbell

615 So. 2d 879, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3822, 1993 WL 84487

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1708

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 615 So. 2d 879 (Campbell v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. Campbell, 615 So. 2d 879, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3822, 1993 WL 84487 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

We reverse the order modifying the final judgment in this marriage dissolution case because court-adopted property settlement agreements, as opposed to support provisions, are not subject to court-ordered modification. Draper v. Draper, 604 So.2d 946 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Kinne v. Kinne, 599 So.2d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Agerskov v. Gabriel, 596 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); McCallum v. McCallum, 577 So.2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); O’Hara v. O’Hara, 564 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Kuhnke v. Kuhnke, 556 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Fahs v. Fahs, 517 So.2d 136 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Flanders v. Flanders, 516 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Stevens v. Stevens, 510 So.2d 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hogshead v. Hogshead, 444 So.2d 74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Bockoven v. Bockoven, 444 So.2d 30 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

REVERSED.

HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

We reverse the order modifying the final judgment in this marriage dissolution case because court-adopted property settlement agreements, as opposed to support provisions, are not subject to court-ordered modification. Draper v. Draper, 604 So.2d 946 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Kinne v. Kinne, 599 So.2d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Agerskov v. Gabriel, 596 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); McCallum v. McCallum, 577 So.2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); O’Hara v. O’Hara, 564 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Kuhnke v. Kuhnke, 556 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Fahs v. Fahs, 517 So.2d 136 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Flanders v. Flanders, 516 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Stevens v. Stevens, 510 So.2d 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hogshead v. Hogshead, 444 So.2d 74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Bockoven v. Bockoven, 444 So.2d 30 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

REVERSED.

HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

615 So. 2d 879, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3822, 1993 WL 84487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-campbell-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack