Campbell v. California
439 U.S. 934, 58 L. Ed. 2d 330
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 30, 1978
DocketNo. 78-5362
StatusPublished
Cited by157 cases
This text of 439 U.S. 934 (Campbell v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Campbell v. California, 439 U.S. 934, 58 L. Ed. 2d 330 (1978).
Opinion
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Related
In Re Rfs Ecusta Inc.
409 B.R. 359 (W.D. North Carolina, 2009)
In Re Vernon-Williams
377 B.R. 156 (E.D. Virginia, 2007)
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. EMPLOYEE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
176 F. Supp. 2d 510 (D. South Carolina, 2001)
Fowler v. Garey (In Re Garey)
258 B.R. 356 (E.D. Virginia, 2000)
Rehabilitation Ass'n of Virginia, Inc. v. Metcalf
8 F. Supp. 2d 520 (E.D. Virginia, 1998)
Cook v. Andrews
7 F. Supp. 2d 733 (E.D. Virginia, 1998)
SunTiger, Inc. v. Scientific Research Funding Group
9 F. Supp. 2d 601 (E.D. Virginia, 1998)
ALLRIGHT MORTGAGE CO. v. Hill
213 B.R. 943 (D. Maryland, 1997)
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Mangione Enterprises of Turf Valley, LP
964 F. Supp. 199 (D. Maryland, 1996)
In Re Pineloch Enterprises, Inc.
192 B.R. 675 (E.D. North Carolina, 1996)
Alexander S. by and Through Bowers v. Boyd
929 F. Supp. 925 (D. South Carolina, 1995)
County of Chesterfield v. Tamojira, Inc. (In Re Tamojira, Inc.)
197 B.R. 815 (E.D. Virginia, 1995)
In Re Breeden
180 B.R. 802 (N.D. West Virginia, 1995)
Sheppard v. Riverview Nursing Centre, Inc.
870 F. Supp. 1369 (D. Maryland, 1994)
Trimper v. City of Norfolk, Va.
846 F. Supp. 1295 (E.D. Virginia, 1994)
Rosciszewski v. Arete Associates, Inc.
1 F.3d 225 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
Rosciszewski v. Arete Associates
1 F.3d 225 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
Johnson & Towers Baltimore, Inc. v. Vessel "Hunter"
824 F. Supp. 562 (D. Maryland, 1992)
In Re Leonard Jed Co.
103 B.R. 706 (D. Maryland, 1989)
Norwood v. CHARLOTTE MEMORIAL HOSP. & MED. CENTER
720 F. Supp. 543 (W.D. North Carolina, 1989)
Fowler v. Garey (In Re Garey)
E.D. Virginia, 2000
the reasonableness of attorney’s fees is to be determined by application of the factors enumerated in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.
Gilliam v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
E.D. Virginia, 1996
adopting Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir.1974)
Johnson & Towers Baltimore, Inc. v. Vessel "Hunter"
D. Maryland, 1992
attorney fee standards for prevailing plaintiff in a civil rights case
Spencer v. General Electric Co.
E.D. Virginia, 1989
embracing factors initially set forth in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir.1974)
Paul S. Segal v. Gilbert Color Systems, Inc.
First Circuit, 1984
Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1640(a)(3)
Redic v. Gary H. Watts Realty Co.
W.D. North Carolina, 1984
award of attorney’s fees under Truth in Lending Act
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
439 U.S. 934, 58 L. Ed. 2d 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-california-scotus-1978.