Campbell v. Annucci

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 14, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-06915·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VAUGHN CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, 23-CV-6915 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL COMMISSIONER ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ET AL., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated August 9, 2023, the Court directed Plaintiff, within 30 days, either to pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court, or to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and prisoner authorization form. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal without prejudice of the complaint. Plaintiff has not paid the fees or filed an IFP application and prisoner authorization. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice and without charge. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Judgment shall enter. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 14, 2023 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. Annucci, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Campbell v. Annucci (Campbell v. Annucci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)