Cammisa v. Zone Oil Trucking Corp.

269 A.D. 785, 55 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3842
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 21, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 785 (Cammisa v. Zone Oil Trucking Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cammisa v. Zone Oil Trucking Corp., 269 A.D. 785, 55 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of the jury. Plaintiff, an employee of the Paragon Oil Company, suffered serious injuries when a boom, attached to a crane truck, fell upon him. The crane and truck were owned by defendant Zone Oil Trucking Corp., and, at the time of the accident, were operated by the individual defendant Maffetone. The boom fell when the operator found it necessary to lower it so that it would pass under a crossbeam which extended over a gateway leading from the yard where the work was being done. At that time plaintiff was standing sixteen or eighteen feet to the rear of the truck and to the side of the boom. The refusal of the court to submit to the jury the question of whether or not Maffetone was generally a coemployee of plaintiff was correct. (Wyllie et al. v. Palmer et al., 137 N. Y. 248, 257; Charles v. Barrett, 233 N. Y. 127; Irwin v. Klein, 271 N. Y. 477, 485; Ramsey v. New York Central R. R. Co., 269 N. Y. 219.) Nor may appellants now urge that the granting of their request to charge at folio 821 was erroneous. Even placing upon the charge the construction contended for' by appellants, having made the request, they are estopped from questioning the propriety of it on appeal. (Whalen v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co., 173 App. Div. 268.) Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present— Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re John J.
89 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Gardner v. Darling Stores Corp.
138 F. Supp. 160 (S.D. New York, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 785, 55 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cammisa-v-zone-oil-trucking-corp-nyappdiv-1945.