Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cameron v. State

Cameron v. State

788 So. 2d 297, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1765, 2001 WL 166638
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-4268
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 788 So. 2d 297 (Cameron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cameron v. State, 788 So. 2d 297, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1765, 2001 WL 166638 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Cameron appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order denying Cameron relief without prejudice to any right Cameron might have to file a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Pro[298]*298cedure 3.850. See Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc).

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cameron v. State
792 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
788 So. 2d 297, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1765, 2001 WL 166638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.