Cameron v. Carroll & Co.

334 P.2d 748, 138 Colo. 432, 1959 Colo. LEXIS 487
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJanuary 26, 1959
Docket18836
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 334 P.2d 748 (Cameron v. Carroll & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cameron v. Carroll & Co., 334 P.2d 748, 138 Colo. 432, 1959 Colo. LEXIS 487 (Colo. 1959).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Day

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff in error, Securities Commissioner of the State of Colorado, will hereinafter be referred to as the Commissioner. The defendant in error will be referred to as Carroll & Co.

*433 By this writ of error the Commissioner seeks to reverse the judgment and order of the district court reversing an order of the Commissioner. The trial court ordered issuance of a license to Carroll & Co. to do business as a broker and dealer in securities after review of the Commissioner’s action in revoking the same.

While writ of error has been pending here, Carroll & Co. voluntarily ceased to do business, surrendered its corporate license to do business as a securities dealer, and requested the Securities Commissioner to cancel its license. Therefore, the sole question upon which the cause is pending in this court (Whether the Securities Commissioner abused his discretion or exceeded his authority in revoking the license of Carroll & Co.?) is moot.

The Commissioner urges this court to decide, not whether the Commissioner acted according to law in revoking Carroll & Co.’s license, but to render an interpretation of the statute under which the Commissioner operates, complaining that the statute as it is written in reference to review of the actions of the Commissioner in licensing matters is vague and uncertain. No provision of the law authorizes this court to give advisory opinions to state agencies other than to the General Assembly or to the Governor when requested upon solemn occasions pursuant to Article VI, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of Colorado.

There being no judicable controversy between the parties before this court, the writ of error is dismissed'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Application for Water Rights
799 P.2d 33 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1990)
City of Aurora v. Division Engineer for Water Division No. 5
799 P.2d 33 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1990)
Van Schaack Holdings, Ltd. v. Fulenwider
798 P.2d 424 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1990)
Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Public Utilities Commission
653 P.2d 1117 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 P.2d 748, 138 Colo. 432, 1959 Colo. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-carroll-co-colo-1959.