Camera Specialty Co. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 304
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Camera Specialty Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Cust. Ct. 27 →
United States Customs Court·Decided November 17, 1955·No. No. 59444; protest 260312-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the repairs to the lenses involved are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Camera Specialty Co., Inc., and Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. v. United States (34 Cust. Ct. 27, C. D. 1672), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Camera Specialty Co. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 304 (cusc 1955).
35 Cust. Ct. 304 (Camera Specialty Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Camera Specialty Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 27 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)