Camera Specialty Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 414
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Camera Specialty Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Cust. Ct. 27 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 23, 1955·No. No. 59170; protests 229984-K, 233653-K, and 236434-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the repairs on the photographic lenses were made in the Western Zone of Germany and that the issues are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Camera Specialty Co., Inc., and Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. v. United States (34 Cust. Ct. 27, C. D. 1672), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Camera Specialty Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 414 (cusc 1955).
34 Cust. Ct. 414 (Camera Specialty Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Camera Specialty Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 27 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)