Calspan Corp. v. Piech
91 A.D.2d 844, 458 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19755
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 1982·Published
Opinions
— Order affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Upon examination of the entire record, we conclude that triable issues of fact exist which compel the denial of both plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment (see Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 NY2d 395). Concur — Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Calspan Corp. v. Piech, 91 A.D.2d 844, 458 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).
91 A.D.2d 844 (Calspan Corp. v. Piech) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elco Shoe Manufacturers, Inc. v. Sisk
183 N.E. 191 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
Murray v. . Beard
7 N.E. 553 (New York Court of Appeals, 1886)
Lamdin v. Broadway Surface Advertising Corp.
5 N.E.2d 66 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
Duane Jones Co. v. Burke
117 N.E.2d 237 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
144 N.E.2d 387 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)