Calspan Corp. v. Piech
This text of 91 A.D.2d 844 (Calspan Corp. v. Piech) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
— Order affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Upon examination of the entire record, we conclude that triable issues of fact exist which compel the denial of both plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment (see Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 NY2d 395). Concur — Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.D.2d 844, 458 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calspan-corp-v-piech-nyappdiv-1982.