Calloway v. State
36 S.E. 63, 111 Ga. 832, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 782
Opinion
While recent possession of stolen goods unexplained will justify a conviction for larceny, the mere possession of goods several months subsequent to the time they were alleged to have been stolen and a failure to satisfactorily account for such possession will not alone authorize a conviction.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Calloway v. State, 36 S.E. 63, 111 Ga. 832, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 782 (Ga. 1900).
36 S.E. 63 (Calloway v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mathis v. State
121 S.E.2d 267 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Wakefield Alias Wingfield v. State
45 S.E.2d 675 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Harper v. State
4 S.E.2d 734 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Miller v. State
176 S.E. 907 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Cook v. State
151 S.E. 397 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Brown v. State
143 S.E. 457 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Shaneyfelt v. State
101 S.E. 592 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Goen v. State
100 S.E. 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
State v. Schimmels
177 P. 685 (Washington Supreme Court, 1919)
Wiley v. State
59 S.E. 438 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)