Cook v. State

153 S.E. 201, 41 Ga. App. 313, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 559
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 15, 1930·No. 20282·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

In Groves v. State, 116 Ga. 516 (42 S. E. 755, 59 L. R. A. 598), the Supreme Court said: “Mere preparatory acts for the commission of a crime, and not proximately leading to its consummation, do not constitute an attempt to commit the crime.” The evidence in this case clearly shows acts “proximately leading” to the consummation of the crime of manufacturing liquor; it shows “overt acts done toward the consummation of the crime.” In Clark's Criminal Law (2d ed.) 125, it is said that “An attempt to commit a crime is an act done with intent to commit that crime and tending to, but falling short of, its consummation.” In 12 Cyc. 177, it is stated that “An attempt to commit crime is an act done with intent to commit it, beyond mere preparation, but falling short of its actual commission.” Under the foregoing rulings and the facts of this case the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. State, 153 S.E. 201, 41 Ga. App. 313, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 559 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

153 S.E. 201 (Cook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. State
44 S.E.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Green v. State
27 S.E.2d 567 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Hammond v. State
171 S.E. 559 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)