Calkins v. Becker

34 N.E.2d 483, 285 N.Y. 408, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1493
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Special Term found as a fact that there was no delivery whatever of either of the instruments in question by the plaintiff to the defendant Rogers. These findings were affirmed by the Appellate Division. Hence there is no support for that court’s conclusion, That in so far as the twenty acre parcel is concerned plaintiff waived any condition imposed upon delivery of the contract by accepting the proceeds of the check of $324.00 as part of the purchase price after the time for performance of the condition had expired.”

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed, with costs to plaintiff-appellant in this court and in the Appellate Division.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calkins v. Becker, 34 N.E.2d 483, 285 N.Y. 408, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1493 (N.Y. 1941).

34 N.E.2d 483 (Calkins v. Becker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calkins v. Becker
37 N.E.2d 142 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)