California Vegetable Union v. Commissioner
This text of 5 B.T.A. 795 (California Vegetable Union v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[796]*796OPINION.
There is no evidence to sustain any of the allegations of fact made by the petitioner. The Commissioner’s determination will therefore have to be sustained. As to the proposition of law relative to reduction of invested capital because of taxes for the preceding taxable period, Congress has definitely settled any question in this regard by section 1207 of the Revenue Act of 1926. See Russel Wheel & Foundry Co., 3 B. T. A. 1168.
Judgment will be entered for the Commissioner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 B.T.A. 795, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/california-vegetable-union-v-commissioner-bta-1926.