California Fig Syrup Co. v. Putnam

First Circuit

California Fig Syrup Co. v. Putnam

69 F. 740, 16 C.C.A. 376, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2425

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJuly 26, 1895

DocketNo. 131

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 69 F. 740 (California Fig Syrup Co. v. Putnam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

California Fig Syrup Co. v. Putnam, 69 F. 740, 16 C.C.A. 376, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2425 (1st Cir. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions of the circuit court in this cause, but we do not wish to be understood to approve all the cases cited in its opinion. It is sufficient to refer to Medicine Co. v. Wood. 108 U. S. 218, 2 Sup. Ct. 436, and to the underlying principles oí Church v. Proctor, 13 C. C. A. 426, 66 Fed. 240, decided by this court February 2, 1895, as supporting the line of reasoning found in that opinion. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions of the circuit court in this cause, but we do not wish to be understood to approve all the cases cited in its opinion. It is sufficient to refer to Medicine Co. v. Wood. 108 U. S. 218, 2 Sup. Ct. 436, and to the underlying principles oí Church v. Proctor, 13 C. C. A. 426, 66 Fed. 240, decided by this court February 2, 1895, as supporting the line of reasoning found in that opinion. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 F. 740, 16 C.C.A. 376, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/california-fig-syrup-co-v-putnam-ca1-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack