California Fig Syrup Co. v. Putnam
69 F. 740, 16 C.C.A. 376, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2425
Opinion
We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions of the circuit court in this cause, but we do not wish to be understood to approve all the cases cited in its opinion. It is sufficient to refer to Medicine Co. v. Wood. 108 U. S. 218, 2 Sup. Ct. 436, and to the underlying principles oí Church v. Proctor, 13 C. C. A. 426, 66 Fed. 240, decided by this court February 2, 1895, as supporting the line of reasoning found in that opinion. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California Fig Syrup Co. v. Putnam, 69 F. 740, 16 C.C.A. 376, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2425 (1st Cir. 1895).
69 F. 740 (California Fig Syrup Co. v. Putnam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.
150 F. 741 (First Circuit, 1906)
Clinton E. Worden & Co. v. California Fig Syrup Co.
102 F. 334 (Ninth Circuit, 1900)
Dadirrian v. Yacubian
98 F. 872 (First Circuit, 1900)
California Fig Syrup Co. v. Frederick Stearns & Co.
73 F. 812 (Sixth Circuit, 1896)