Home/Ninth Circuit/California ex rel. Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.

California ex rel. Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.

387 F.3d 966, 2004 WL 2415116
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 29, 2004·No. Nos. 02-16619, 02-16625, 02-16629, 03-15588·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion filed July 6, 2004 is hereby amended as follows:

At page 8863 of the slip opinion, footnote 17, delete the parenthetical quotation and add the following two sentences at the conclusion of footnote 17 as follows:

At issue are not state regulatory schemes for employment discrimination, workers compensation, or the like, which might indirectly and unintentionally have some possible effect on energy prices. Rather, the lawsuit seeks directly to enforce federal tariff obligations.

With this amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to deny appellant’s petition for rehearing. Judge O’Scannlain has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Hall and Leavy recommend that the petition for rehearing en banc be denied.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. RApp. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California ex rel. Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc., 387 F.3d 966, 2004 WL 2415116 (9th Cir. 2004).

387 F.3d 966 (California ex rel. Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northeastern Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Wabash Valley Power Ass'n
707 F.3d 883 (Seventh Circuit, 2013)
Gerald Carlin v. Dairyamerica, Inc.
688 F.3d 1117 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Carlin v. DairyAmerica, Inc.
705 F.3d 856 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Schafer v. Exelon Corp.
619 F. Supp. 2d 507 (N.D. Illinois, 2007)
Anderson v. Bayer Corp.
171 F. App'x 18 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Ingram v. Bayer Corp.
166 F. App'x 953 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
People of the State of California, Ex Rel. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California v. Dynegy, Inc. Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc. Nrg Energy, Inc. Xcel Energy, Inc. West Coast Power LLC Cabrillo Power I LLC Cabrillo Power II LLC El Segundo Power LLC Long Beach Generation Llc, People of the State of California, Ex Rel. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California v. Reliant Energy, Inc. Reliant Energy Services, Inc. Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc. Reliant Resources, Inc. Reliant Energy Coolwater, LLC Reliant Energy Ellwood, LLC Reliant Energy Etiwanda, LLC Reliant Energy Mandalay, LLC Reliant Energy Ormond Beach, Llc, People of the State of California, Ex Rel. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California v. Mirant Corporation Mirant California, L.L.C. Mirant Potrero L.L.C. Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, L.P. Mirant California Investments, Inc. Mirant Americas Inc. Southern Energy Golden States Holdings, Inc., People of the State of California, Ex Rel. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California v. Reliant Energy, Inc. Reliant Energy Services, Inc. Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc. Reliant Resources, Inc. Reliant Energy Coolwater, LLC Reliant Energy Ellwood, LLC Reliant Energy Etiwanda, LLC Reliant Energy Mandalay, LLC Reliant Energy Ormond Beach, LLC Mirant Corporation Mirant California, L.L.C. Mirant Delta, L.L.C. Mirant Potrero, LLC Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, L.P. Mirant California Investments, Inc. Mirant Americas, Inc. Southern Energy Golden States Holdings, Inc. Dynegy, Inc. Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc. Nrg Energy, Inc. Xcel Energy, Inc. West Coast Power, L.L.C. Cabrillo Power I, L.L.C. Cabrillo Power II LLC El Segundo Power, L.L.C. Long Beach Generation LLC
387 F.3d 966 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)