California Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 13, 2023·No. 2:19-cv-02019·Unknown

Opinion

1 || Trenton H. Norris (CA Bar No. 164781) trent.norris@hoganlovells.com 2 || David M. Barnes (CA Bar No. 318547) 3 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3500 4 || San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 374-2300 5 || Facsimile: (415) 374-2499 6 Attorneys for California Chamber of Commerce

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 || | CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, | Case No. 2:19-cv-02019-DJC-JDP i Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY D SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER v. B Judge: Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta ROB BONTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL Action Filed: October 7, 2019 14 CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF | SAC Filed: April 19, 2023 THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Hearing: May 9, 2023 I5 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPUTATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER: ORDER

1 JOINT STIPULATION 2 WHEREAS, the Court finalized its Scheduling Order on September 7, 2023 (ECF No. 3 || 248); 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff California Chamber of Commerce, Defendant Rob Bonta, in his 5 || official capacity as Attorney General of California, and Defendant-Intervenor Council for 6 || Education and Research on Toxics (collectively, the “Parties”) have made no prior requests for 7 || extensions or modifications to the Scheduling Order; 8 WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant have trials in other cases in late April 2024 that 9 || conflict with the motion briefing deadlines in the Scheduling Order, and the parties have agreed it 10 |} will be beneficial to extend the briefing schedule; 11 WHEREAS, due to the Court’s order granting the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF 12 || No. 114) by Plaintiff, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld on March 17, 13 |} 2022, see Cal. Chamber of Commerce v. Council for Educ. & Rsch. on Toxics, 29 F.4th 468 (9th 14 || Cir. 2022), the status quo ante is preserved, insofar as possible, during the pendency of the 15 || proceedings in this action; 16 WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred on modifications to the Scheduling Order 17 || and have negotiated a briefing schedule for the anticipated summary judgment motion(s) that they 18 |} request the Court consider; 19 WHEREAS, the Court has not yet set a trial date or final pretrial conference date; 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the Parties, by and through their respective 21 || attorneys of record, and subject to the approval of the Court, that the Scheduling Order shall be 22 || modified as follows: 23 1. The deadline to disclose expert witnesses, previously set for November 17, 2023, be 24 moved to December 15, 2023; 25 2. The deadline to disclose expert witnesses for rebuttal purposes, previously set for 26 December 15, 2023, be moved to January 19, 2024; 27 3. The cutoff for fact discovery remain as January 12, 2024; 28 4. The cutoff for all expert discovery, previously set for January 12, 2024, be moved to

1 March 15, 2024; 2 5. The deadline to file any motions (except motions for continuances, temporary 3 restraining orders, or other emergency applications), previously set for March 22, 4 2024, be moved to May 10, 2024; 5 6. The hearing on any such motions (except motions for continuances, temporary 6 restraining orders, or other emergency applications), previously set for May 9, 2024 at 7 1:30 PM, be moved to September 19, 2024 at 1:30 PM, or the next available date for 8 the Court; 9 7. Consistent with the foregoing, the Parties have agreed to the following briefing 10 schedule on the motion(s) for summary judgment: 11 a. Defendant will inform Plaintiff by April 26, 2024 whether he plans to file a cross- 12 motion for summary judgment; 13 b. Plaintiff will file its Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) by May 10, 2024; 14 c. Defendant will file his opposition to Plaintiff's Motion, as well as any cross- 15 motion for summary judgment, by June 21, 2024; 16 d. Plaintiff will file its reply in support of its Motion, and its opposition to any cross- 17 motion, by July 26, 2024; 18 e. Defendant will file his reply in support of his cross-motion, if any, by August 16, 19 2024. 20 51 Dated: November 9, 2023 Respectfully submitted, By: ___/s/ Trenton H. Norris Trenton H. Norris 23 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 35th Floor 24 San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 95 Tel: (415) 374-2300 trent.norris@hoganlovells.com 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff California Chamber of Commerce 27 28

1 |} Dated: November 9, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 2 ROB BONTA 3 Attorney General of California LAURA J. ZUCKERMAN 4 Supervising Deputy Attorney General 5 By: _/s/ Megan K. Hey 6 MEGAN HEY 7 RAFAEL HURTADO Deputy Attorneys General 8 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702 9 Los Angeles, CA 90013-1230 10 Telephone: (213) 269-6344 E-mail: Megan.Hey@do}.ca.gov 1 Attorneys for Rob Bonta, Attorney General of the State of California 12 13 || Dated: November 9, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 14 15 By: __/s/ Raphael Metzger Raphael Metzger, Esq. 16 Scott Brust, Esq. METZGER LAW GROUP 17 A Professional Law Corporation 18 401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 800 Long Beach, CA 90802 19 Tel: (562) 437-4499 rmetzger@toxictorts.com 20 Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendant, Council for Education and Research on Toxics

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Based on the Joint Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ° ORDERED that the Scheduling Order be modified as follows: 1. The deadline to disclose expert witnesses, previously set for November 17, 2023, ° be moved to December 15, 2023; ° 2. The deadline to disclose expert witnesses for rebuttal purposes, previously set ’ for December 15, 2023, be moved to January 19, 2024; 3. The cutoff for fact discovery remain as January 12, 2024; ° 4. The cutoff for all expert discovery, previously set for January 12, 2024, be moved '0 to March 15, 2024; " 5. The deadline to file any motions (except motions for continuances, temporary 2 restraining orders, or other emergency applications), previously set for March 22, 8 2024, be moved to May 10, 2024; 4 6. The hearing on any such motions (except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other emergency applications), previously set for May 9, 2024 at 1:30 PM, be moved to September 19, 2024 at 1:30 PM; 7. Consistent with the foregoing, the following briefing schedule shall apply to any 8 motion(s) for summary judgment: ” a. Defendant will inform Plaintiff by April 26, 2024 whether he plans to file a cross-motion for summary judgment; a b. Plaintiff will file its Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) by May 2 10, 2024; 23 c. Defendant will file his opposition to Plaintiffs Motion, as well as any “ cross-motion for summary judgment, by June 21, 2024; d. Plaintiff will file its reply in support of its Motion, and its opposition to any *6 cross-motion, by July 26, 2024; e. Defendant will file his reply in support of his cross-motion, if any, by 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER

] August 16, 2024. 2 | ITIS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: November 9, 2023 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

California Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta (California Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

California Chamber of Commerce v. Cert
29 F.4th 468 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)