Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United States
This text of 37 Cust. Ct. 287 (Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The previous record indicated that protest 181203-K was abandoned as to entry 6535 and that as to all of the entries covered by protest 274919-K, except entry 6535, the collector had conceded the validity of the protest claim and reliquidated the entries accordingly. It was stipulated in both protests herein that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulations of counsel and following the cited decision, the claim in protest 181203-K, with respect to all of the entries enumerated therein, except entry 6535, for duty at 12)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), was sustained as to the items marked “A,” and the claim in the said protest, with respect to all of the said entries, except entry 6535, for duty at 20 percent under said paragraph, as modified, supra, was sustained as to the items marked “B.” Protest 274919-K having been validated as to all of the entries enumerated therein, except entry 6535, only the latter entry was before the court for disposition. The claim in said protest, with respect to entry 6535, for duty at 12)4 percent under paragraph 412, as modified, supra, was sustained as to the items marked “A,” and the claim in the said protest, with respect to said entry 6535, at 20 percent under said paragraph, as modified, supra, was sustained as to the items marked “B.” Protest 181203-K, having been abandoned with respect to entry 6535, was dismissed only to that extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 Cust. Ct. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calif-asia-rattan-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.