Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 275
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Cust. Ct. 154 →
United States Customs Court·Decided February 3, 1955·No. No. 58742; protest 226524-K (Los Angeles)·Published
Opinion
[276]*276Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of floor coverings, composed wholly or in chief value of rush and not of grass or of rice straw, which do not have a felt base, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstracts 57889 and 57890, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 275 (cusc 1955).
34 Cust. Ct. 275 (Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.