Calhoun v. State

17 So. 3d 858, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12823, 2009 WL 2763138
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 2, 2009·No. No. 3D09-1711·Published

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

Petition dismissed. Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472, 479 (Fla.2003) (holding that the court will “not entertain pro se extraordinary writ petitions from criminal defendants seeking affirmative relief in the context of pending trial court criminal cases, where it is clear from the face of the petitions that the petitioners are represented by counsel in the pending criminal proceedings and the petitioners do not clearly indicate that they are seeking to discharge counsel in those proceedings”).

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calhoun v. State, 17 So. 3d 858, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12823, 2009 WL 2763138 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

17 So. 3d 858 (Calhoun v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)