Calhoun v. State

4 So. 3d 79, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3471, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 460
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2009·No. 5D08-412·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Calhoun challenges the order entered by the trial court on November 19, 2008, wherein the trial court specified the conditions of probation allegedly violated by Calhoun. The order was entered in response to Calhoun’s motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). Calhoun argues that the trial court was without jurisdiction to render the order because the trial court had not acted within the *80 required time period. The State concedes error. Alfonzo v. State, 962 So.2d 381 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Accordingly, the November 19, 2008 order is quashed and this cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing.

Order QUASHED; REMANDED.

PALMER, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calhoun v. State, 4 So. 3d 79, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3471, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 460 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

4 So. 3d 79 (Calhoun v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alfonzo v. State
962 So. 2d 381 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)