Caldwell v. Sutton

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 21, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-05236·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY Sf DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCH! □□

BOISEY CALDWELL, [DATE FIL ED: Aves □ Plaintiff, -against- 19 CIVIL 5236 (VEC) JUDGMENT ELINOR SUTTON, a! yee Defendant. een nee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons

stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 20, 2020, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and thus, in forma pauperis status for purposes of appeal is denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a non- frivolous issue); accordingly, this case is closed. : . Dated: New York, New York July 21, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caldwell v. Sutton, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Caldwell v. Sutton (Caldwell v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)