Caldwell v. State
This text of 22 A.D.2d 834 (Caldwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum by the Court. Claimants’ contentions are based principally on the construction they would give to section 53 of the Highway Law; but we find no suggestion that the purpose of that provision was other than to preserve the State’s right to eminent domain over Indian property and to make clear the State’s retention of administrative control over Indian property and rights. It was not intended to increase the State’s supervisory responsibility and consequent liability in negligence. Judgments affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P, J,, Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur. [39 Misc 2d 898.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 A.D.2d 834, 253 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-state-nyappdiv-1964.