Caldwell v. Meador

4 Ala. 755
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1843·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

It is true, the statute in very general terms authorizes any Judge of the Circuit or County Courts, or any Justice of the Peace, to issue writs of attachment; [Digest, 37, §2,] but we think these powers are conferred with reference to the extent of the general duties of these officers, and that it was not intended to enlarge the circle of their jurisdiction. Ordinarily, the duties of a Justice of the Peace are to be exercised by him within his proper county, and where general terms are used with reference to new duties imposed on this grade of officers, they must be considered as confined to the county, unless a more extensive jurisdiction is expressly given.

We think the Justice had no jurisdiction to issue this attachment, and therefore the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caldwell v. Meador, 4 Ala. 755 (Ala. 1843).

4 Ala. 755 (Caldwell v. Meador) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
118 S.W. 139 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1909)
Little v. Fitts
33 Ala. 343 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Martin v. Dollar
32 Ala. 422 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Young v. Davis
30 Ala. 213 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)
Brooks & Lucas v. Godwin
8 Ala. 296 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845)