Brooks & Lucas v. Godwin

8 Ala. 296
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORMOND, J.

The attachment in this case was issued by a Justice of the peace, for Russell county, returnable to the Circuit Court of Macon. This, in Caldwell v. Meador, 4 Ala. Rep. 755, was held to be a fatal defect. It is now attempted to distinguish this case, from that, because there the objection was taken in the Court below, but we are unable to see that this varies the case. The want of jurisdiction appears on the face of the attachment, which is the leading process in the action, and as there has been no waiver by appearing, and pleading to the merits, it is avail-ble on error. Let the judgment be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks & Lucas v. Godwin, 8 Ala. 296 (Ala. 1845).

8 Ala. 296 (Brooks & Lucas v. Godwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Dollar
32 Ala. 422 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Young v. Davis
30 Ala. 213 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)