Caldwell & Drake v. Pierce

159 S.W. 559, 154 Ky. 771, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 157
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided September 23, 1913·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Response to Petition for Rehearing by

Chief Justice Hobson

Reversing.

Upon a reconsideration of this case, we conclude that appellee should he allowed interest on the balance found due her from the filing of her petition. The judgment determines that this amount was then due her, and should have been paid. The general rule is that interest is allowed on the balance due on an account from the bringing of the suit. (Tobin v. South, 18 R., 350; Henderson Cotton Mfg. Co. v. Lowell Machine Shops, 86 Ky., 668.)

The opinion is extended to this extent; the judgment appealed from is reversed on the cross appeal; and the cause remanded for a judgment as above indicated. In other respects the petition for rehearing is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caldwell & Drake v. Pierce, 159 S.W. 559, 154 Ky. 771, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 157 (Ky. Ct. App. 1913).

159 S.W. 559 (Caldwell & Drake v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mock v. Trustees of First Baptist Church of Newport
67 S.W.2d 9 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)
Fyffe v. Skaggs
54 S.W.2d 369 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)
Martin v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
47 S.W.2d 524 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)