Caldwell & Drake v. Pierce

159 S.W. 559, 154 Ky. 771, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 157
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedSeptember 23, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 159 S.W. 559 (Caldwell & Drake v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell & Drake v. Pierce, 159 S.W. 559, 154 Ky. 771, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 157 (Ky. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Response to Petition for Rehearing by

Chief Justice Hobson

Reversing.

Upon a reconsideration of this case, we conclude that appellee should he allowed interest on the balance found due her from the filing of her petition. The judgment determines that this amount was then due her, and should have been paid. The general rule is that interest is allowed on the balance due on an account from the bringing of the suit. (Tobin v. South, 18 R., 350; Henderson Cotton Mfg. Co. v. Lowell Machine Shops, 86 Ky., 668.)

The opinion is extended to this extent; the judgment appealed from is reversed on the cross appeal; and the cause remanded for a judgment as above indicated. In other respects the petition for rehearing is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mock v. Trustees of First Baptist Church of Newport
67 S.W.2d 9 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)
Fyffe v. Skaggs
54 S.W.2d 369 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)
Martin v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
47 S.W.2d 524 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 S.W. 559, 154 Ky. 771, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-drake-v-pierce-kyctapp-1913.