Calderon v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

906 So. 2d 1138, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9217, 2005 WL 1398502
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 2005·No. No. 3D04-3280·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission which dismissed the appeal of Carlos E. Calderon. The appeal was untimely because it was not filed within twenty days of the date that the referee’s decision was mailed to him. See § 443.151(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004); Malary v. Brinker Int’l Payroll, 898 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). There is no claim that the appellant failed to receive the appeals referee’s decision, or that he received it too late to file a timely appeal. See Guerrero v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 855 So.2d 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calderon v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 906 So. 2d 1138, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9217, 2005 WL 1398502 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

906 So. 2d 1138 (Calderon v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
80 So. 3d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)