Calaf v. Calaf
16 P.R. 795
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Calaf v. Calaf. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 P.R. Dec. 198 →
Opinion
First motion overruled because the Supreme Court has no authority to modify or alter the statement of facts, by considering exhibits which did not form part thereof. Second motion sustained said photographic copy being ordered stricken out.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Calaf v. Calaf, 16 P.R. 795 (prsupreme 1910).
16 P.R. 795 (Calaf v. Calaf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.