Calabi v. Conway

468 F. Supp. 76, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7038
CourtDistrict Court, D. Vermont
DecidedDecember 26, 1978
DocketCiv. A. No. 75-264
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 468 F. Supp. 76 (Calabi v. Conway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calabi v. Conway, 468 F. Supp. 76, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7038 (D. Vt. 1978).

Opinion

ORDER

This Court issued an Opinion and Order in this matter dated October 7, 1977, and filed October 11, 1977, which Opinion is reported sub nom. Calabi v. Malloy, at 438 F.Supp. 1165 (D.Vt.1977). The plaintiffs subsequently moved that the Court alter or amend its judgment, and for rehearing. The parties, by and through their attorneys, have now reached a Stipulation with regard to this cause. Accordingly, based on the pleadings of record, and the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:

1. The previous Opinion of this Court is hereby amended as follows, the Court striking hereby any provisions inconsistent with this Order.

2. The defendant and his successors, agents, and employees, shall not suspend motor vehicle operators’ licenses, or the right of unlicensed persons to operate motor vehicles within the State of Vermont, pursuant to 23 V.S.A. § 671(c) or 23 V.S.A. § 2205(e), except as set forth in the Administrative Criteria which are attached to the end of this Order and made a part hereof by reference. By issuing this Order, this Court is not ordering the defendant to suspend licenses, but rather is ordering that the defendant may not suspend licenses except as set forth in said Administrative Criteria. Accordingly, this Court is not confirming the constitutionality or validity of the attached Criteria, or any portion thereof.

3. The defendant shall, within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed ten (10) days from November 17,1978, take reasonable steps to make the existence of the attached Administrative Criteria known to the public, including making the existence of these Administrative Criteria known to State Police officers, and will make copies of these Administrative Criteria available to any members of the public requesting same. The defendant shall supply to town clerks, State Police barracks, and other places in which he normally makes available information concerning the Department of Motor Vehicles, copies of the attached Administrative Criteria within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed thirty (30) days from November 17, 1978.

4. Within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed thirty (30) days from November 17, 1978, the defendant shall cause the following notice to accompany notices sent to persons suspending their motor vehicle operator’s licenses or their right to operate motor vehicles within the State of Vermont pursuant to 23 V.S.A. § 671(c) or 23 V.S.A. § 2205(c):

“Notice: Your license or right to drive is being suspended in accordance with certain written Administrative Criteria. You may obtain copies of these Administrative Criteria from the Department of Motor Vehicles, town clerk’s offices, State Police barracks, and other locations. The effective date of your suspension may be postponed for five (5) days if you so request as set forth in the Criteria.”

This notice, which shall be in all capital letters, will be indicated on the front of suspension notices, if this is reasonably possible, and, if not reasonably possible, on the back of suspension notices or by a separate sheet accompanying the suspension notices. The Commissioner may add this notice by printing on the form, stickers, rubber stamp, or any other method he chooses.

[78]*785. It is ordered that the named plaintiffs and intervening plaintiffs shall not have their licenses suspended for the convictions for which temporary restraining orders were issued in this cause, except that these previous convictions may be considered in determining suspensions based upon additional convictions for further motor vehicle offenses.

6. The Court acknowledges that plaintiffs have reserved the right to request the Court to order payment of reasonable attorney’s fees, and that defendant has reserved the right to object to the award of any attorney’s fees.

7. The Court also acknowledges that defendant, by entering into the Stipulation aforementioned, has not admitted any improper-, illegal, or actionable conduct or lack thereof of any kind or nature, the defendant entering into said Stipulation solely in an effort to settle the dispute.

8. The Court acknowledges that except as otherwise set forth in this Order or in the Stipulation aforementioned, plaintiffs otherwise withdraw their motion to alter or amend judgment, and for rehearing.

ADMINISTRATIVE CRITERIA — MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE SUSPENSIONS FOR MINOR MOVING VIOLATIONS

1. To Whom Do These Criteria Apply? These Criteria apply to persons convicted of speeding and other relatively minor violations. These violations are listed at the end of these Criteria.

2. Under What Circumstances Will an Individual’s License Be Suspended? Your motor vehicle operator’s license, or right to operate a motor vehicle within the State of Vermont, will be suspended under these Criteria only if you are convicted of one of the offenses listed at the end of these Criteria and if at least one of the following is true:

A. The offense for which you are convicted is a second or subsequent moving violation within six (6) months of a previous moving violation, based upon the date of the offense; or
B. An accident occurred as a result of the offense, involving damage, injury or death to some person other than you; or
C. Your license or right to drive has been suspended or reinstated for a moving violation, which suspension or reinstatement occurred within two (2) years preceding the date of this conviction; or
D. You have had four (4) moving violations all of which occurred within the five (5) years preceding the date of this conviction, and your license or right to drive was not suspended for these violations.

3. Length of Suspension. Your license will be suspended for a number of days calculated by adding together the number of days set forth under each of the following:

A. If this is the second or subsequent conviction for a violation within six (6) months, based upon the date of offenses: 10 days.
B. If the violation resulted in damage to property owned by someone other than yourself: 5 days.
C. If the violation resulted in injury to someone other than yourself: 10 days.
D. If the violation resulted in someone’s death: 30 days.
E. If your license or right to drive has been suspended or reinstated for a moving violation within the two (2) years prior to the date of this conviction: 5 days for each occurrence.
F. If you have had four (4) moving violations within five (5) years from the date of this conviction, with no prior suspension of your license or right to drive: 10 days.

4. Minimum and Maximum Suspension Period. Notwithstanding what is set forth in the preceding paragraph, if your license or right to operate a motor vehicle is suspended, it will not be suspended for less than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days.

5. Exceptions to These Criteria. Your motor vehicle operator’s license, or right to operate a motor vehicle within the State of [79]*79Vermont, may be suspended in accordance with laws other than these with which these Criteria are concerned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dubin v. County of Nassau
277 F. Supp. 3d 366 (E.D. New York, 2017)
In Re Kelton Motors, Inc.
117 B.R. 87 (D. Vermont, 1990)
Lillios v. Justices of New Hampshire District Court
735 F. Supp. 43 (D. New Hampshire, 1990)
ANDREW H. BY IRENE H. v. Ambach
600 F. Supp. 1271 (N.D. New York, 1984)
Best v. State, Department of Transportation
299 N.W.2d 604 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1980)
Baker v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority
490 F. Supp. 520 (S.D. Ohio, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 F. Supp. 76, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calabi-v-conway-vtd-1978.