Cajuste v. State

949 So. 2d 1108, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1783, 2007 WL 465563
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 2007
DocketNo. 3D06-2551
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 949 So. 2d 1108 (Cajuste v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cajuste v. State, 949 So. 2d 1108, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1783, 2007 WL 465563 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Pope v. State, 702 So.2d 221 (Fla.1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sell v. Sell
949 So. 2d 1108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
949 So. 2d 1108, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1783, 2007 WL 465563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cajuste-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.