Caiazza v. Merola
This text of 90 A.D.3d 491 (Caiazza v. Merola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action for equitable distribution of property following a partial foreign judgment of divorce, plaintiff now seeks equitable distribution of certain property which was not specifically addressed in the Italian judgment of divorce. However, the record did not support plaintiffs contention that her claims could not have been raised during the Italian proceedings, and the instant action was properly dismissed as barred by res judicata (see O’Connell v Corcoran, 1 NY3d 179, 185 [2003]; De Ganay v De Ganay, 269 AD2d 157 [2000]).
We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Renwick, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.3d 491, 935 N.Y.2d 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caiazza-v-merola-nyappdiv-2011.